| Scientific Name | Chaenostoma calciphilum (Hilliard) Kornhall | Higher Classification | Dicotyledons | Family | SCROPHULARIACEAE | Synonyms | Sutera affinis of other authors, Hiern FC 4,2 (1904) (in part), not of (Bernh.) Kuntze (misapplied name), Sutera calciphila Hilliard |
National Status | Status and Criteria | Least Concern | Assessment Date | 2005/06/30 | Assessor(s) | W. Foden & L. Potter | Justification | This taxon was not selected in any one of four screening processes for highlighting potential taxa of conservation concern for detailed assessment and was hence given an automated status of Least Concern. The Threatened Species Programme is currently systematically completing full assessments for all taxa with an automated status. If you disagree with this taxon's status, please contact the Threatened Species Programme at the link below. |
Distribution | Endemism | South African endemic | Provincial distribution | Western Cape |
Habitat and Ecology | Major system | Terrestrial |
Population | Population trend | Stable |
Assessment History |
Taxon assessed |
Status and Criteria |
Citation/Red List version | | Chaenostoma calciphilum (Hilliard) Kornhall | Least Concern | Raimondo et al. (2009) | |
Bibliography | Raimondo, D., von Staden, L., Foden, W., Victor, J.E., Helme, N.A., Turner, R.C., Kamundi, D.A. and Manyama, P.A. 2009. Red List of South African Plants. Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
|
Citation | | Foden, W. & Potter, L. 2005. Chaenostoma calciphilum (Hilliard) Kornhall. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version . Accessed on 2025/04/18 |
 Comment on this assessment
|
Search for images of Chaenostoma calciphilum on iNaturalist
|
