Taxonomy
Scientific Name
Brunia laevis Thunb.
Higher Classification
Dicotyledons
Family
BRUNIACEAE
National Status
Status and Criteria
Near Threatened A2c; B1b(iii,v)
Assessment Date
2021/10/26
Assessor(s)
H. Mtshali & S. Privett
Justification
This resprouting shrub is endemic to sandstone and limestone habitats in the Western Cape Province of South Africa where it has a restricted distribution with an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 6015 km². It is known from many locations, however, the population is declining due to over harvesting for the cut flower industry and encroachment of its habitat by alien invasive plants. An estimated 27% of the population is suspected to have been lost over the past 150 years as a result of habitat loss to crop cultivation, habitat degradation due to invasive alien plants and overharvesting for the cut flower trade (generation length 50-70 years). It is therefore listed as Near Threatened under criteria A and B.
Distribution
Endemism
South African endemic
Provincial distribution
Western Cape
Range
This species is endemic to the Western Cape Province of South Africa, occurring from the Hottentots Holland Mountains to the Agulhas Plain.
Habitat and Ecology
Major system
Terrestrial
Major habitats
Overberg Sandstone Fynbos, Kogelberg Sandstone Fynbos, Hawequas Sandstone Fynbos, Agulhas Limestone Fynbos, Elim Ferricrete Fynbos
Description
It is a resprouting shrub that grows on rocky sandstone and limestone, on mid- to lower slopes.
Threats
At least 27% of this species' habitat is irreversibly modified due to cop cultivation. It is one of the most sought after wild fynbos species (Privett et al. 2020). This species is threatened by illegal harvesting for the cut flower industry. It is not viable as a cultivated product, and so harvesters are wholly dependent on wild Brunia populations. While this species is resilient to intense harvesting over a short time period, harvesting of 100% of stems over a time period of greater than five years is not sustainable (Privett et al. 2014). Ongoing poaching by illegal harvesters is negating sustainable harvesting efforts by landowners. In addition to this, poaching activity is driving legal harvest of this species at a younger age than would usually be practised (Bek and O'Grady 2018). Other threat to this species is encroachment of its habitat by alien invasive plants.
Population

The overall population size of this species is unknown, but hundreds of plants have been observed in collection sites and it is considered to be locally common. This resprouting species is thought to be resilient to intensive harvesting over the short-term. Over a number of years, the species can even tolerate 100% harvesting of its stems (Privett et al. 2014), and anecdotal evidence suggests that many local harvesters believe that, effectively, this species cannot be overharvested (Bek and O'Grady 2018). Harvesting at 100% intensity over a time period of greater than five years, though, is not sustainable (Privett et al. 2014), and a number of factors make this scenario a real possibility. Firstly, this species does not reproduce well from seed, and thus it is almost exclusively harvested from wild plants; secondly, for some contractors, the ability to harvest Silver Brunia is critical to offsetting industry costs, so high demand is likely for the foreseeable future; finally, there is evidence that poaching of Silver Brunia is ongoing, negating sustainable harvesting efforts by landowners (Bek and O'Grady 2018). In addition to this, poaching activity is driving legal harvest of Silver Brunia at a younger age than would usually be practised (Bek and O'Grady 2018). As this species is currently one of the most sought after wild fynbos plants, harvesting is placing pressure on the wild population (Privett et al. 2020), and the population is declining. Furthermore, an estimated 27% of the population is suspected to have decline as a result of the combined impacts of overharvesting and loss of habitat to crop cultivation and invasive alien plants over the past 150 years. There is ongoing low levels of habitat loss to cultivation.


Population trend
Decreasing
Assessment History
Taxon assessed
Status and Criteria
Citation/Red List version
Brunia laevis Thunb.Least Concern Raimondo et al. (2009)
Bibliography

Bek, D. and O'Grady, K. 2018. The scale, structure and sustainability of the wild fynbos harvesting supply chain in the Cape Floral Kingdom. Cape Town, South Africa.


Goldblatt, P. and Manning, J.C. 2000. Cape Plants: A conspectus of the Cape Flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town.


Manning, J.C. and Goldblatt, P. 2012. Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region 1: The Core Cape Flora. Strelitzia 29. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.


Privett, S., Bailey, R., Raimondo, D., Kirkwood, D. and Euston-Brown, D. 2005. A vulnerability index for rare and harvested plant species on the Agulhas Plain. Flower Valley Conservation Trust.


Privett, S., Bek, D., Bailey, R., Binns, T., Raimondo, D., Kirkwood, D. and Euston-Brown, D. 2020. Conservation in the context of wildflower harvesting: the development and implementation of a Vulnerability Index on the Agulhas Plain of South Africa. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63(10):1738�1757.


Privett, S.D.J., Krug, R.M., Forbes, G. and Gaertner, M. 2014. Wild Flower Harvesting on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa: Impact of Harvesting Intensity under a Simulated Commercial Harvesting Regime for Two Re-Seeding and Two Re-Sprouting Fynbos Species. South African Journal of Botany 94 270-275.


Raimondo, D., von Staden, L., Foden, W., Victor, J.E., Helme, N.A., Turner, R.C., Kamundi, D.A. and Manyama, P.A. 2009. Red List of South African Plants. Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.


Citation
Mtshali, H. & Privett, S. 2021. Brunia laevis Thunb. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version . Accessed on 2025/04/20

Comment on this assessment Comment on this assessment
Distribution map


Search for images of Brunia laevis on iNaturalist