|
Scientific Name | Laportea peduncularis (Wedd.) Chew subsp. peduncularis |
Higher Classification | Dicotyledons |
Family | URTICACEAE |
Synonyms | Fleurya caffra Chew, Fleurya capensis (L.f.) Wedd. var. mitis Wedd., Fleurya capensis of other authors, not of (L.f.) Wedd. (misapplied name), Fleurya mitis (Wedd.) N.E.Br., Fleurya mitis Wedd., Fleurya peduncularis Wedd., Fleurya peduncularis Wedd. var. mitis (Wedd.) Wedd., Laportea caffra Chew, Urtica mitis Hochst. |
Common Names | Bosbrandkneukel (a), Bosbrandnekel (a), Bosbrandnetel (a), Dzaluma (v), Imbabazane (z), Imbathi (z), River Nettle (e), Stinging Nettle (e), Ubazi (x), Ububasa (x) |
National Status |
Status and Criteria | Least Concern |
Assessment Date | 2005/06/30 |
Assessor(s) | W. Foden & L. Potter |
Justification | This taxon was not selected in any one of four screening processes for highlighting potential taxa of conservation concern for detailed assessment and was hence given an automated status of Least Concern. The Threatened Species Programme is currently systematically completing full assessments for all taxa with an automated status. If you disagree with this taxon's status, please contact the Threatened Species Programme at the link below. |
Distribution |
Endemism | Not endemic to South Africa |
Provincial distribution | Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga, Western Cape |
Habitat and Ecology |
Major system | Terrestrial |
Assessment History |
Taxon assessed |
Status and Criteria |
Citation/Red List version | | Laportea peduncularis (Wedd.) Chew subsp. peduncularis | Least Concern | Raimondo et al. (2009) | |
Bibliography |
Raimondo, D., von Staden, L., Foden, W., Victor, J.E., Helme, N.A., Turner, R.C., Kamundi, D.A. and Manyama, P.A. 2009. Red List of South African Plants. Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
|
Citation |
| Foden, W. & Potter, L. 2005. Laportea peduncularis (Wedd.) Chew subsp. peduncularis. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version . Accessed on 2024/12/04 |
Comment on this assessment
