Kudu Lily

Taxonomy
Scientific Name
Pachypodium saundersii N.E.Br.
Higher Classification
Dicotyledons
Family
APOCYNACEAE
Common Names
Insema-yamatshe (z), Isihlehle (z), Koedoelelie (a), Kudu Lily (e), Rathbonia (e)
National Status
Status and Criteria
Least Concern
Assessment Date
2022/10/21
Assessor(s)
N.N. Mhlongo
Justification
This species has an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 123 441 km² and an area of occupancy (AOO) of 256 km². It is known from more than 28 subpopulations and is threatened by habitat loss, alien invasive plants and potential harvesting. The species is currently assessed as Least Concern as it is too abundant to be at risk of extinction in the near future, however the population trends should be monitored.
Distribution
Endemism
Not endemic to South Africa
Provincial distribution
KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga
Range
This species is endemic to southern Africa and has a wide distribution ranging from South Africa into Zimbabwe and southern Mozambique. In South Africa, it stretches from KwaZulu-Natal along the Lebombo range into Mpumalanga and Limpopo.
Habitat and Ecology
Major system
Terrestrial
Major habitats
Mopane Gabbro Shrubland, Granite Lowveld, Crocodile Gorge Mountain Bushveld, Zululand Lowveld, Makatini Clay Thicket, Southern Lebombo Bushveld, Ohrigstad Mountain Bushveld
Description
Plants grow in rock crevices in dry lowveld woodland.
Threats
This species has lost 20% suitable habitat (calculated using GIS) and its habitat is heavily infested by invasive alien species through its South African range. It is also popular in the ornamental horticulture trade and 10 666 live plants have been exported from South Africa since 1976.
Population

This species has had 109 observations posted by citizen scientists on the iNaturalist platform between 2013 and 2023 from across its known range, from these observations we infer that the population is locally common, stable and not declining.


Population trend
Decreasing
Assessment History
Taxon assessed
Status and Criteria
Citation/Red List version
Pachypodium saundersii N.E.Br.Least Concern Raimondo et al. (2009)
Pachypodium saundersii N.E.Br.Not Threatened Hilton-Taylor (1996)
Pachypodium saundersii N.E.Br.Indeterminate Hall et al. (1980)
Bibliography

Codd, L.E. 1963. Apocynaceae. In: R.A. Dyer, L.E. Codd and H.B. Rycroft (eds). Flora of southern Africa 26 (Myrsinaceae-Apocynaceae):244-296. Botanica Research Institute, Pretoria.


Hall, A.V., De Winter, M., De Winter, B. and Van Oosterhout, S.A.M. 1980. Threatened plants of southern Africa. South African National Scienctific Programmes Report 45. CSIR, Pretoria.


Hilton-Taylor, C. 1996. Red data list of southern African plants. Strelitzia 4. South African National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.


Raimondo, D., von Staden, L., Foden, W., Victor, J.E., Helme, N.A., Turner, R.C., Kamundi, D.A. and Manyama, P.A. 2009. Red List of South African Plants. Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.


Citation
Mhlongo, N.N. 2022. Pachypodium saundersii N.E.Br. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version . Accessed on 2025/03/22

Comment on this assessment Comment on this assessment
Distribution map


Search for images of Pachypodium saundersii on iNaturalist