|
Scientific Name | Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. arundinaceum (Desv.) de Wet & Harlan |
Higher Classification | Monocotyledons |
Family | POACEAE |
Synonyms | Sorghum arundinaceum (Desv.) Stapf, Sorghum castaneum C.E.Hubb. & Snowden, Sorghum lanceolatum Stapf, Sorghum panicoides Stapf, Sorghum usambarense Snowden, Sorghum verticilliflorum (Steud.) Stapf, Sorghum verticilliflorum (Steud.) Stapf var. infrequens Snowden, Sorghum virgatum (Hack.) Stapf |
National Status |
Status and Criteria | Least Concern |
Assessment Date | 2005/06/30 |
Assessor(s) | L. Fish & J.E. Victor |
Justification | This taxon was not selected in any one of four screening processes for highlighting potential taxa of conservation concern for detailed assessment and was hence given an automated status of Least Concern. The Threatened Species Programme is currently systematically completing full assessments for all taxa with an automated status. If you disagree with this taxon's status, please contact the Threatened Species Programme at the link below. |
Distribution |
Endemism | Not endemic to South Africa |
Provincial distribution | Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga, Northern Cape, North West |
Habitat and Ecology |
Major system | Terrestrial |
Assessment History |
Taxon assessed |
Status and Criteria |
Citation/Red List version | | Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. arundinaceum (Desv.) de Wet & Harlan | Least Concern | Raimondo et al. (2009) | |
Bibliography |
Raimondo, D., von Staden, L., Foden, W., Victor, J.E., Helme, N.A., Turner, R.C., Kamundi, D.A. and Manyama, P.A. 2009. Red List of South African Plants. Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
|
Citation |
| Fish, L. & Victor, J.E. 2005. Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. arundinaceum (Desv.) de Wet & Harlan. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants version . Accessed on 2025/05/10 |
Comment on this assessment
